Financial Goals and Metrics Help Firms Implement Strategy and Track Success
By Pedro M. Kono, DBA, and Barry Barnes, PhD.
Reprinted by permission from the Graziadio Business Report, Vol. 13, Issue 1, 2010
http://gbr.pepperdine.edu/101/finance.html
The fundamental success of a strategy depends on three critical factors: a firm's alignment with the
external environment, a realistic internal view of its core competencies and sustainable competitive
advantages, and careful implementation and monitoring. This article discusses the role of finance in
strategic planning, decision making, formulation, implementation, and monitoring. |
Any person, corporation, or nation should know who or where they are, where they want to be, and how to
get there. The strategic-planning process utilizes analytical models that provide a realistic picture of the
individual, corporation, or nation at its "consciously incompetent" level, creating the necessary motivation
for the development of a strategic plan. The process requires five distinct steps outlined below and the
selected strategy must be sufficiently robust to enable the firm to perform activities differently from its rivals
or to perform similar activities in a more efficient manner.
A good strategic plan includes metrics that translate the vision and mission into specific end points. This is
critical because strategic planning is ultimately about resource allocation and would not be relevant if
resources were unlimited. This article aims to explain how finance, financial goals, and financial
performance can play a more integral role in the strategic planning and decision-making process,
particularly in the implementation and monitoring stage.
The Strategic-Planning and Decision-Making Process
1. Vision Statement
The creation of a broad statement about the company's values, purpose, and future direction is the first
step in the strategic-planning process. The vision statement must express the company's core ideologieswhat
it stands for and why it exists-and its vision for the future, that is, what it aspires to be, achieve, or
create.
2. Mission Statement
An effective mission statement conveys eight key components about the firm: target customers and
markets; main products and services; geographic domain; core technologies; commitment to survival,
growth, and profitability; philosophy; self-concept; and desired public image. The finance component is
represented by the company's commitment to survival, growth, and profitability. The company's long-term
financial goals represent its commitment to a strategy that is innovative, updated, unique, value-driven,
and superior to those of competitors.
3. Analysis
This third step is an analysis of the firm's business trends, external opportunities, internal resources, and
core competencies. For external analysis, firms often utilize Porter's five forces model of industry
competition, which identifies the company's level of rivalry with existing competitors, the threat of substitute
products, the potential for new entrants, the bargaining power of suppliers, and the bargaining power of
customers.
For internal analysis, companies can apply the industry evolution model, which identifies takeoff
(technology, product quality, and product performance features), rapid growth (driving costs down and
pursuing product innovation), early maturity and slowing growth (cost reduction, value services, and
aggressive tactics to maintain or gain market share), market saturation (elimination of marginal products
and continuous improvement of value-chain activities), and stagnation or decline (redirection to fastestgrowing
market segments and efforts to be a low-cost industry leader).
Another method, value-chain analysis clarifies a firm's valuecreation
process based on its primary and secondary
activities. This becomes a more insightful analytical tool when
used in conjunction with activity-based costing and
benchmarking tools that help the firm determine its major
costs, resource strengths, and competencies, as well as
identify areas where productivity can be improved and where
re-engineering may produce a greater economic impact.
SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) is
a classic model of internal and external analysis providing
management information to set priorities and fully utilize the
firm's competencies and capabilities to exploit external
opportunities, determine the critical weaknesses that need to
be corrected, and counter existing threats.
4. Strategy Formulation
To formulate a long-term strategy, Porter's generic strategies
model is useful as it helps the firm aim for one of the following
competitive advantages: a) low-cost leadership (product is a
commodity, buyers are price-sensitive, and there are few
opportunities for differentiation); b) differentiation (buyers'
needs and preferences are diverse and there are
opportunities for product differentiation); c) best-cost provider
(buyers expect superior value at a lower price); d) focused
low-cost (market niches with specific tastes and needs); or e)
focused differentiation (market niches with unique
preferences and needs).
5. Strategy Implementation and Management
In the last ten years, the balanced scorecard (BSC) has
become one of the most effective management instruments
for implementing and monitoring strategy execution as it
helps to align strategy with expected performance and it
stresses the importance of establishing financial goals for
employees, functional areas, and business units. The BSC
ensures that the strategy is translated into objectives,
operational actions, and financial goals and focuses on four
key dimensions: financial factors, employee learning and
growth, customer satisfaction, and internal business
processes.
The Role of Finance
Financial metrics have long been the standard for assessing a
firm's performance. The BSC supports the role of finance in
establishing and monitoring specific and measurable financial
strategic goals on a coordinated, integrated basis, thus
enabling the firm to operate efficiently and effectively.
Financial goals and metrics are established based on
benchmarking the "best-in-industry" and include:
1. Free Cash Flow
This is a measure of the firm's financial soundness and shows
how efficiently its financial resources are being utilized to
generate additional cash for future investments. It represents
the net cash available after deducting the investments and
working capital increases from the firm's operating cash flow.
Companies should utilize this metric when they anticipate
substantial capital expenditures in the near future or followthrough
for implemented projects.
2. Economic Value-Added
This is the bottom-line contribution on a risk-adjusted basis
and helps management to make effective, timely decisions to
expand businesses that increase the firm's economic value
and to implement corrective actions in those that are
destroying its value. It is determined by deducting the
operating capital cost from the net income. Companies set
economic value-added goals to effectively assess their
businesses' value contributions and improve the resource
allocation process.
3. Asset Management
This calls for the efficient management of current assets
(cash, receivables, inventory) and current liabilities
(payables, accruals) turnovers and the enhanced
management of its working capital and cash conversion cycle.
Companies must utilize this practice when their operating
performance falls behind industry benchmarks or
benchmarked companies.
4. Financing Decisions and Capital Structure
Here, financing is limited to the optimal capital structure (debt
ratio or leverage), which is the level that minimizes the firm's
cost of capital. This optimal capital structure determines the
firm's reserve borrowing capacity (short- and long-term) and
the risk of potential financial distress. Companies establish
this structure when their cost of capital rises above that of
direct competitors and there is a lack of new investments.
5. Profitability Ratios
This is a measure of the operational efficiency of a firm.
Profitability ratios also indicate inefficient areas that require
corrective actions by management; they measure profit
relationships with sales, total assets, and net worth.
Companies must set profitability ratio goals when they need to
operate more effectively and pursue improvements in their
value-chain activities.
6. Growth Indices
Growth indices evaluate sales and market share growth and determine the acceptable trade-off of growth
with respect to reductions in cash flows, profit margins, and returns on investment. Growth usually drains
cash and reserve borrowing funds, and sometimes, aggressive asset management is required to ensure
sufficient cash and limited borrowing. Companies must set growth index goals when growth rates have
lagged behind the industry norms or when they have high operating leverage.
7. Risk Assessment and Management
A firm must address its key uncertainties by identifying, measuring, and controlling its existing risks in
corporate governance and regulatory compliance, the likelihood of their occurrence, and their economic
impact. Then, a process must be implemented to mitigate the causes and effects of those risks. Companies
must make these assessments when they anticipate greater uncertainty in their business or when there is
a need to enhance their risk culture.
8. Tax Optimization
Many functional areas and business units need to manage the level of tax liability undertaken in conducting
business and to understand that mitigating risk also reduces expected taxes. Moreover, new initiatives,
acquisitions, and product development projects must be weighed against their tax implications and net
after-tax contribution to the firm's value. In general, performance must, whenever possible, be measured
on an after-tax basis. Global companies must adopt this measure when operating in different tax
environments, where they are able to take advantage of inconsistencies in tax regulations.
Conclusion
The introduction of the balanced scorecard emphasized financial performance as one of the key indicators
of a firm's success and helped to link strategic goals to performance and provide timely, useful information
to facilitate strategic and operational control decisions. This has led to the role of finance in the strategic
planning process becoming more relevant than ever.
Empirical studies have shown that a vast majority of corporate strategies fail during execution. The above
financial metrics help firms implement and monitor their strategies with specific, industry-related, and
measurable financial goals, strengthening the organization's capabilities with hard-to-imitate and nonsubstitutable
competencies. They create sustainable competitive advantages that maximize a firm's value,
the main objective of all stakeholders.
About the Authors:
Pedro M. Kono, DBA, is a professor of finance at Graziadio School of Business and Management at
Pepperdine University and Fox School of Business at Temple University. He is also the president of Key
Financing Solutions, a company engaged in structuring vendor programs and international financing.
Dr. Kono worked for many years for Citigroup in the U.S., U.K., Japan, and Brazil, and gained significant
international and diversified management experience at commercial banking, leasing, and finance
companies. He obtained his doctoral degree from Wayne Huizenga School of Business and
Entrepreneurship at Nova Southeastern University and has conducted research in the fields of
corporate finance, specifically in the investment area, and corporate strategy. He is currently
researching the market efficiency hypothesis and the performance of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
in the U.S., Japan, and Brazil.
F. Barry Barnes, PhD, is the Chair of Leadership at Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale,
Florida, where he teaches graduate-level courses in leadership, strategic decision making, and
organizational behavior. In 2009, he received an Outstanding Research Award at the Global
Conference on Business and Finance; he received a Best Paper Award at the International Global
Academy of Business, and he was selected as Faculty Member of the Year in 2000. Dr. Barnes has
published in the International Journal of Organizational Analysis, The International Journal of Business
Research, Review of Business Research, the Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship,
and other journals. His recent research and writing focus on the relationship between leadership,
organizational change, and strategy, as well as the innovative and improvisational business practices of
the legendary rock band the Grateful Dead. |
|